Ubuntu中文论坛

Conclusions: Linux

Linux gives you freedom on many levels: the freedom to tinker, the freedom to work without arbitrary constraints on your system setup, and the freedom to make decisions about nearly every aspect of your system.

That freedom does come at a cost, though -- the cost of a certain degree of effort. I haven't yet dealt with a single Linux install that didn't require me to edit some configuration file somewhere. That said, the amount of effort required to get the Linux system you want (or need) has gone down enormously with time.

If the freedom to use your PC in as unhindered a way as possible is important to you, that's what Linux delivers -- although keep in mind it comes with a learning curve, one that is still flattening out rather slowly.

-- Serdar Yegulalp

Conclusions: Mac

If you believe that open source is a moral choice -- and many people do -- then buying Apple is making a deal with the devil. Apple is arguably the most proprietary hardware / software company in the industry, despite Mac OS X's origins in BSD Unix, and the products' compliance with many industry standards.

You think Microsoft locks users in? At least with Microsoft you can buy a PC from a huge number of big and small vendors, or build your own from components. With the Mac, you buy your PC from Apple, you buy your operating system from Apple, and you're also encouraged to buy your mouse, keyboard, display, audio device, and smartphone from Apple, all at an Apple Store where you can get Apple service.

But if you're willing to live with lock-in, Apple is a great choice for computing. Installation isn't a problem -- Apple does it for you. Networking is easy. Productivity is a dream. The Mac offers a broad variety of entertainment options. It's a secure platform. It interoperates well with Windows. It's highly stable, and offers solid backup choices for the data losses that are inevitable on any computing platform.

Right now, Apple is smokin', and its customers are happy. But if the Apple gets rotten and starts coming out with inferior products -- as it did in the '90s -- its customers will have the choice of suffering, or making the painful switch to another platform.

Until then, I'm sticking with the Mac. It's a great computer.

结论: linux系统

linux系统,让你自由的,多层次的自由:摇钱树, 工作自由,不受任意限制你的系统设置, 并自由地作出决定,对几乎每一个方面,你的系统.

自由是否有代价的,虽然--成本,在一定程度上的努力. 我尚未处理的一个linux安装时,并不需要我来编辑一些配置文件的某处. 说, 数额所需付出的努力得到linux系统的,你想要(或需要)也下跌了不少时间.

如果可以自由地使用你的电脑中畅行无阻地可能是你最重要的, 说的是什么linux系统提供了--虽然记住,它配备了一个学习曲线, 一个是仍处于平缓相当缓慢.

--塞达登yegulalp

结论: 囗囗囗

如果你认为开放源码是一个道义上的选择--很多人的事--然后买苹果 正与魔鬼对抗. 苹果可说是最专有硬件/软件公司,在业界 尽管mac os x的起源在bsd ,产品也符合很多行业标准.

你认为微软锁定用户? 至少与微软你可以购买一台电脑,从数量庞大的大公司和小商 或建立自己的组件. 与陆委会,你买你的电脑,从苹果电脑,你买你的操作系统从苹果, 并且你还鼓励购买你的鼠标,键盘,显示器,音响设备,并从智能,苹果 所有在苹果那里,你可以得到,苹果的服务.

不过,如果你愿意住在同锁,苹果公司是一个伟大的选择计算. 安装是不是一个问题--苹果公司是否为你. 网络是很容易的. 生产力是一个梦想. 陆委会提供各种各样的娱乐选择. 它的一个安全平台. 它交互好窗户. 它的高度稳定性,并提供了坚实的后备选择,数据的损失是不可避免的任何计算平台.

目前,苹果电脑smokin'intheboysroom ' ,它的顾客满意. 但如果苹果烂得到,并起出低劣产品--那样在九十年代 --客户将可以有选择的痛苦,还是痛苦的转换到另一平台.

直到那时,我坚持与陆委会的. 这是一个伟大的电脑.

laborer 写了：google translate翻译的

laborer 写了：直到那时,我坚持与陆委会的. 这是一个伟大的电脑.