vfantasie 写了:LS好有趣啊,看得懂中文又用英文回复……
好吧,我也来试一下:
1. I didn't try to compile Emacs. I download it from FSF, and I found it is really really slow(in my XP box).
2. "个人以为LISP的语法相当不够优雅。" ==Translate to Enlgish==> "
*Personally speaking*, I think LISP is not elegant."
And most importantly, jobinson99 has already mastered python, he needn't to learn a new(and probably hard) language to
extend VIM.

I don't wanna start another Editor War here~
What I've said are only my personal view.
I just wanna recommend VIM, which I think is very excellent choice, to jobinson99,

-1. I don't want to start editor war, I used to be vim user since 7+ years ago, and I can say I know both editor not as an fresh user.
0. My Chinese input method crashed due to some applet issue, sorry.
1. I mean compile *.el code into *.elc code(not binary code, but byte code) will give you some start-up speed up.
2. Python, Perl, Ruby, etc, have their own advantage over Lisp. But consider Emacs functionality, elisp is maybe a better choice.
People tried to extend Emacs with some language like Python etc finally failed. It doesn't prove Python is not suitable for the job, but there are tons of legacy elisp file that you have to translate manually(you can imagine what a huge work it will be).