晕了，我的dapper是reiserfs4和xjfsurFan 写了：以前用的是reiserfs，但装Ubuntu 6.10时提示没有根分区，改用ext3后安装成功，目前用Ubuntu 6.10的没有投票的必要，似乎就只有选择ext3，别的系统另当别论。
看来升级不到edgy了
统计一下大家所用的文件系统
-
likuku
- 帖子： 24
- 注册时间： 2006-06-02 22:50
-
roylez
- 帖子： 1928
- 注册时间： 2005-10-04 10:59
- 来自： 上海
看看这篇吧，里面把ext3说得很惨。不过上次我的硬盘无缘无故出现坏道导致几个命令不能使用之后，就对reiserfs产生了恐惧感，现在都在用ext3。
http://navindra.blogspot.com/2004/10/kd ... ilure.html
http://navindra.blogspot.com/2004/10/kd ... ilure.html
✡ 弄个dropbox空间来备份文件或者做私人代码服务器？
✡ 配置：[url]git://github.com/roylez/dotfiles.git[/url]
✡ 主页：http://roylez.heroku.com
✡ 各种稀奇玩意儿：http://dooloo.info
✡ 配置：[url]git://github.com/roylez/dotfiles.git[/url]
✡ 主页：http://roylez.heroku.com
✡ 各种稀奇玩意儿：http://dooloo.info
-
BigSnake.NET
- 帖子： 12522
- 注册时间： 2006-07-02 11:16
- 来自： 廣州
- 联系：
-
skywalker25
- 帖子： 10
- 注册时间： 2006-10-01 15:04
- 联系：
-
BigSnake.NET
- 帖子： 12522
- 注册时间： 2006-07-02 11:16
- 来自： 廣州
- 联系：
-
zhuqin_83
- 帖子： 10606
- 注册时间： 2006-05-13 4:02
- 联系：
-
5451vs5451
- 帖子： 345
- 注册时间： 2006-07-14 18:56
- 来自： Apple Valley, Planet Tux, Linux System
-
millenniumdark
- 论坛版主
- 帖子： 4159
- 注册时间： 2005-07-02 14:41
- 系统： Ubuntu 14.04 (Kylin)
- 联系：
-
Jimmy.Zhou
- 帖子： 475
- 注册时间： 2006-12-05 21:51
- 来自： Vienna, Austria
-
blisdom
- 帖子： 3
- 注册时间： 2006-04-22 16:57
ext3 =ext2 + journaling,so i just use ext2 on my laptop.....
# Master System
* default/unpatched Redhat EL3-Workstation
* Intel S875WP1E Motherboard - 800FSB
* Intel P4-2.8G - 800FSB - 512KB L2 cache
* 1GB or 2GB of PC-3200 DDR-333 memory
* 80GB Seagate Master disk = /dev/hda
* 80GB Seagate Target disk = /dev/hdc --> target filesystem to be tested
# Test Process
* Partition table is kept constant during these test (partitioned w/ fdisk only once)
* Format the Target disk with the test Filesystem
* Copy the Master Disk filesystem to the Target Disk
* Do multiple kernel compile on the Target Disk filesystem
Test1 - 3 passes
o 1GB of memory
o It takes longer to write data on each succesive pass
Test-10 -- 10 passes
o Only the kernel compiles were done on the Target disk, Master disk was unchanged
o Script was changed, start/end time fo formatted not displayed
o It takes longer to write data on each succesive pass -- bad --
o XFS seems to be immune to delays in successive passes
* These kernel compiles Tests ( T1 and T2 ) were done by:
o Format the Target Disk w/ the target filesystem to test
o install RH-EL3 onto the target filesystem and boot it
o do 10 kernel compile passes after booting the target filesystem
T1 -- 4 passes on 1st Master identical as 2nd Master
o 1st kernel compile pass takes the longest
T2 -- 4 passes on 2nd Master identical as 1st Master
o 1st kernel compile pass takes the longest
---------------
Summary: Ext2 vs Ext3 vs ReiserFS vs JFS vs XFS
Formatting
Test1 T10 T1 T2 <<--- Different Tests
Ext2 :38 :39 :40 :40
Ext3 :39 :41 :42 :41
ReiserFS :07 :07 :07 :06
JFS :02 :02 :02 :01 ==> 10x faster formatting
XFS :02 :02 :02 :02 ==> 10x faster formatting
Data-Copying
Test1 T10 T1 T2 <<--- Different Tests
Ext2 7:54 . 7:40 6:30
Ext3 10:42 . 10:30 9:22 ---> ext3 is generally slow for copying
ReiserFS 8:10 . 7:58 6:43 --> better
JFS 8:55 . 8:29 7:25
XFS 8:48 . 8:33 7:22
Kernel-Compile
Test1 T10 T1 T2 <<-- Different Tests
Ext2 . . 3:51 3:51
Ext3 . . 4:14 4:13
ReiserFS . . 4:00 4:02 --> better
JFS . . 4:11 4:11
XFS . . 4:04 4:04
# Master System
* default/unpatched Redhat EL3-Workstation
* Intel S875WP1E Motherboard - 800FSB
* Intel P4-2.8G - 800FSB - 512KB L2 cache
* 1GB or 2GB of PC-3200 DDR-333 memory
* 80GB Seagate Master disk = /dev/hda
* 80GB Seagate Target disk = /dev/hdc --> target filesystem to be tested
# Test Process
* Partition table is kept constant during these test (partitioned w/ fdisk only once)
* Format the Target disk with the test Filesystem
* Copy the Master Disk filesystem to the Target Disk
* Do multiple kernel compile on the Target Disk filesystem
Test1 - 3 passes
o 1GB of memory
o It takes longer to write data on each succesive pass
Test-10 -- 10 passes
o Only the kernel compiles were done on the Target disk, Master disk was unchanged
o Script was changed, start/end time fo formatted not displayed
o It takes longer to write data on each succesive pass -- bad --
o XFS seems to be immune to delays in successive passes
* These kernel compiles Tests ( T1 and T2 ) were done by:
o Format the Target Disk w/ the target filesystem to test
o install RH-EL3 onto the target filesystem and boot it
o do 10 kernel compile passes after booting the target filesystem
T1 -- 4 passes on 1st Master identical as 2nd Master
o 1st kernel compile pass takes the longest
T2 -- 4 passes on 2nd Master identical as 1st Master
o 1st kernel compile pass takes the longest
---------------
Summary: Ext2 vs Ext3 vs ReiserFS vs JFS vs XFS
Formatting
Test1 T10 T1 T2 <<--- Different Tests
Ext2 :38 :39 :40 :40
Ext3 :39 :41 :42 :41
ReiserFS :07 :07 :07 :06
JFS :02 :02 :02 :01 ==> 10x faster formatting
XFS :02 :02 :02 :02 ==> 10x faster formatting
Data-Copying
Test1 T10 T1 T2 <<--- Different Tests
Ext2 7:54 . 7:40 6:30
Ext3 10:42 . 10:30 9:22 ---> ext3 is generally slow for copying
ReiserFS 8:10 . 7:58 6:43 --> better
JFS 8:55 . 8:29 7:25
XFS 8:48 . 8:33 7:22
Kernel-Compile
Test1 T10 T1 T2 <<-- Different Tests
Ext2 . . 3:51 3:51
Ext3 . . 4:14 4:13
ReiserFS . . 4:00 4:02 --> better
JFS . . 4:11 4:11
XFS . . 4:04 4:04