BitTyrant 不错的Bt客户端

[ct]

一般我都设到40，反正对我用处不大，不如便宜别人。
今天azureus更新到3.0了，越来越让人满意了，本来想推荐下的，就发到这里吧。

Welcome to Azureus 3.0.0.5

This is a mid-release (aka CVS Snapshot) version of Azureus. Thank you for beta testing Azureus.

For Azureus 2 users, you will notice the version has changed to 3. Relax, this does not mean we are forcing you to the new "zudeo" UI. Since Azureus 3 and Azureus 2 use the same source, it didn't make much sense to continue calling the CVS snapshot versions "2.5.0.x".

[leec0621]

你们都太狠了~~我从来都不限制上传和下载速度的~

[neomi]

这就是所谓“自私的” p2p 客户端，
好个调整上传/下载比率，
国内大多 BT 软件都是这类做法，甚至还有些是只进不出。


当大家都用标准的 p2p 的时候，少数几个“自私的”可以获得明显的好处，
当大家都用“自私的”p2p 的时候..

如今国内尽是所谓“自私”客户端，正是你说的“当大家都用“自私的”p2p 的时候..”，试问抱怨的都是谁呢？

标准若是一成不变，那还是不要的好吧。

就在更多客户端探索 bt 出路之时，却仍有人在谈什么“标准”

何况要谈标准，单就选择文件下载这一条就够不标准了（会给上传者增加很多负担），如今还不是连 bittorrent 都支持了

标准要迎合大家的需求，而不是少数几个人的一厢情愿

[millenniumdark]

这就是所谓“自私的” p2p 客户端，
好个调整上传/下载比率，
国内大多 BT 软件都是这类做法，甚至还有些是只进不出。


当大家都用标准的 p2p 的时候，少数几个“自私的”可以获得明显的好处，
当大家都用“自私的”p2p 的时候..

Isn't BitTyrant just another leeching client?

No. BitTyrant does not change the amount of data uploaded, just which peers receive that data. Specifically, peers which upload more to you get more of your bandwidth. When all peers use the BitTyrant client as released, performance improves for the entire swarm. The details of this are explained further below. In our paper, we consider situations in which peers use clients which attempt to both maximize performance and conserve upload contribution, but BitTyrant, as released, attempts only to maximize performance.

How is BitTyrant different from existing BitTorrent clients?

BitTorrent differs from existing clients in its selection of which peers to unchoke and send rates to unchoked peers. Suppose your upload capacity is 50 KBps. If you’ve unchoked 5 peers, existing clients will send each peer 10 KBps, independent of the rate each is sending to you. In contrast, BitTyrant will rank all peers by their receive / sent ratios, preferentially unchoking those peers with high ratios. For example, a peer sending data to you at 20 KBps and receiving data from you at 10 KBps will have a ratio of 2, and would be unchoked before unchoking someone uploading at 10 KBps (ratio 1). Further, BitTyrant dynamically adjusts its send rate, giving more data to peers that can and do upload quickly and reducing send rates to others.

它會優先選擇上傳多的給它上傳，同時也把更多的上傳帶寬分給上傳多的。

Won’t BitTyrant hurt overall BitTorrent performance if everyone uses it?

This is a subtle question and is treated most thoroughly in the paper. The short answer is: maybe. A big difference between BitTyrant and existing BitTorrent clients is that BitTyrant can detect when additional upload contribution is unlikely to improve performance. If a client were truly selfish, it might opt to withhold excess capacity, reducing performance for other users that would have received it. However, our current BitTyrant implementation always contributes excess capacity, even when it might not improve performance. Our goal is to improve performance, not minimize upload contribution.

[skyx]

我一般上传设为200k/s,太低下载速度就会低于1M/s。200k/s是我试出来的。

[zhuqin_83]

刚试过，bittyrant还不如azureus2.5.0.4，连upnp端口都无法映射。azureus反倒可以，速度和bitstormlite差不多。
ktorrent也不行。deluge、rtorrent之类的就更不用说了。

[内存不足]

bitstormlite如果有个好点的管理界面（类似于Deluge) 别的都可以不用了 我这里还是bitstormlite最快。就是管理起来不甚方便。

[Element]

不错，终于有一个BT软件在我的机子上跑起来了。

[szllm]

在WINDOWS下，偶用BITTORRENT，最高上行达到过200多K。
一般下个700M的文件就上传2个多G。。。

[cnshzj007]

我也来试用一下吧！相信LZ了。

[trend1975]

这个好，带JAR的，方便

[lyman]

这就是所谓“自私的” p2p 客户端，
好个调整上传/下载比率，
国内大多 BT 软件都是这类做法，甚至还有些是只进不出。


当大家都用标准的 p2p 的时候，少数几个“自私的”可以获得明显的好处，
当大家都用“自私的”p2p 的时候..

如今国内尽是所谓“自私”客户端，正是你说的“当大家都用“自私的”p2p 的时候..”，试问抱怨的都是谁呢？

标准若是一成不变，那还是不要的好吧。

就在更多客户端探索 bt 出路之时，却仍有人在谈什么“标准”

何况要谈标准，单就选择文件下载这一条就够不标准了（会给上传者增加很多负担），如今还不是连 bittorrent 都支持了

标准要迎合大家的需求，而不是少数几个人的一厢情愿

提高自身修养，抵制慢性中毒。

[rusan]

我有时候会全速上传的，上传600KB／S，下载20KB／S，搞的机器笨笨的，呵呵～～

[贝隆]

好东西，我试试：）

[lysonic]

怎么安装啊？我下载后双击解压，进入azureus目录后点什么也没反应，用./azureus提示bash: ./azureus: Permission denied